According to an article in yesterday’s “New York Times,” Paula Abdul’s departure from “American Idol” is the culmination of months of resentment, bitterness and feelings of being unappreciated (on Paula’s end), while Fox execs are said to have had it up to here with her “histrionics.”
The story goes on to outline a scenario in which Abdul sees a wealth of post-Idol opportunities on the horizon, and although there’s been talk of her possibly landing on “Dancing With the Stars” or “So You Think You Can Dance,” whether her next gig proves to be as lucrative as “Idol” remains to be seen. Meanwhile, she feels betrayed by producers and her fellow judges, whom she thinks didn’t sufficiently defend her against charges of drunkenness/substance abuse, sleeping with contestants, etc., claiming this lack of support cost her big-bucks endorsement deals.
On the other side of the coin, producers are said to have grown weary of constantly cleaning up after these various messes — although I’ve always wondered if the annual Paula scandal, usually timed before each season premiere, wasn’t just a series of canny PR stunts. Their view: yes, Paula is valuable to the success of the show, but ultimately not worth the grief she was bringing them.
Other factors (none surprising): Paula was pissed that Simon and Seacrest just signed deals waaay richer than what she was being offered; she viewed the addition of Kara to the judging table as Fox’s way of keeping her in line by sending her a message that she could be replaced.
According to the story, an unnamed source said to be close to the negotiations said, “A lot of people at Fox had mixed feelings about Paula. Some of the people who were having to deal with her on a day-to-day basis didn’t want her back.”
Meanwhile, “a person close to Ms. Abdul” says that her salary demands were to make up for an endorsement deal that fell through after her loopy behaviour and slurred speech led to rumours of booze and/or drug abuse, and her fellow judges made jokes instead of springing to her defense. “She perceived that the incident had a negative impact on her career,” the “person close to her” said.
Yet another factor was her change in management, hiring new manager David Sonenberg in June. Reportedly, Sonenberg’s aggressive tactics and strategy of negotiating the deal in the press ticked off the network. “It didn’t go over well at all here,” said an unnamed Fox exec.
Meanwhile, TMZ is reporting that Paula met with ABC prez Steve McPherson yesterday afternoon to discuss her participation as a guest judge on the upcoming season of "Dancing With the Stars." TMZ also reports that this won't be happening, since Paula and "DWtS" judge Carrie Ann Inaba "don't get along."
Comments
None of this comes as any surprise
Yep, Paula has always seemed pretty high-maintenance to me. I've never seen anyone else wear a sling after receiving a bad manicure. At any rate, even though Fox figures it was quite easy to replace her with a less expensive version (Kara), I'll really miss Paula. You just can't make up that kind of loopy!
>Meanwhile, “a person
>Meanwhile, “a person close to Ms. Abdul” says that her salary demands were to make up for an endorsement deal that fell through after her loopy behaviour and slurred speech led to rumours of booze and/or drug abuse, and her fellow judges made jokes instead of springing to her defense. “She perceived that the incident had a negative impact on her career,” the “person close to her” said."
Ya think?!?!
PAULA GONE...NOT!
I just won't believe it til I see it! Nope...I don't believe she's going to go.
Heard that far too many times.
Plus, I don't really want to see her gone. I know...she can be over the edge at times....yes...and her and Simon...well who knows...are they an item or not....and uh huh...I know that she can be right out there with her sense of fashion flare next to Mr T-shirt and the Big Dog....but I would miss her anyway. Half of the laughter is Paula's antics and no matter what...even when she isn't dancing and singing...she is entertaining!!
Reply
Login here or register to post your comment now. Anonymous comments are welcome, but they must first go to an approval queue.
TVWeek Online reserves the right to discard or unpublish any comments deemed inappropriate or incongruent to our editorial policy. Accounts through which such comments are repeatedly posted may be suspended.